A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Periods post about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their relatives household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological repercussions, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Get visual evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Location of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised ideas. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the condition that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline along with the symbolic character from the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental troubles like environmental defense and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site One of the more closely viewed preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.